<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marginal Madness</title>
	<link>http://www.buzzshout.com/shoutblog/2006/05/24/marginal-madness/</link>
	<description>Covering new companies and people in the Web 2.0 world</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: James Yu</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzshout.com/shoutblog/2006/05/24/marginal-madness/#comment-16</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 15:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.buzzshout.com/shoutblog/2006/05/24/marginal-madness/#comment-16</guid>
					<description>I was disagreeing with the statement that TechCrunch wouldn't cover those kinds of original strategies (or &quot;judo&quot; oppurtunities, as you say). I can't list any off the top of my head at the moment, but I remember finding out about various sites that are quite original from TechCrunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was disagreeing with the statement that TechCrunch wouldn&#8217;t cover those kinds of original strategies (or &#8220;judo&#8221; oppurtunities, as you say). I can&#8217;t list any off the top of my head at the moment, but I remember finding out about various sites that are quite original from TechCrunch.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzshout.com/shoutblog/2006/05/24/marginal-madness/#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 12:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.buzzshout.com/shoutblog/2006/05/24/marginal-madness/#comment-15</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the trackback! But which part do you disagree with - the idea that it is strategically advantageous to go &quot;where the other guy ain't&quot; or that those kinds of &quot;judo&quot; opportunities don't get covered adequately by TechCrunch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the trackback! But which part do you disagree with - the idea that it is strategically advantageous to go &#8220;where the other guy ain&#8217;t&#8221; or that those kinds of &#8220;judo&#8221; opportunities don&#8217;t get covered adequately by TechCrunch?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
